Skip to main content

Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography versus radiographic hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency.

مؤلف البحث
Hamed HO1, Shahin AY, Elsamman AM.
مجلة البحث
Int J Gynaecol Obstet.
المشارك في البحث
الناشر
2009 Jun;105(3):215-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.001. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
تصنيف البحث
1
عدد البحث
2009 Jun;105(3):215-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.001. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
موقع البحث
PMID: 19339010 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
سنة البحث
2009
صفحات البحث
2009 Jun;105(3):215-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.001.
ملخص البحث

Abstract
OBJECTIVE:

To compare the efficacy of hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) using a saline solution with that of radiographic hysterosalpingography (HSG) in the assessment of tubal patency.
METHOD:

We compared the findings obtained by the 2 methods with those obtained by standard diagnostic laparoscopy with the chromopertubation test in a study with 88 infertile women younger than 40 years.
RESULTS:

The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of HyCoSy and HSG were similar, and 65 (74%) of the women reported the pain associated with HyCoSy as mild to moderate.
CONCLUSION:

The HyCoSy procedure is well tolerated and can be used as a primary tool for the evaluation of tubal patency in infertile women.