Skip to main content

What’s the clinical significance of adding diffusion and perfusion MRI
in the differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme and solitary
brain metastasis?

مؤلف البحث
Amr F. Mourad , Hosam El-din G. Mohammad, Mona M. Sayed , Mohamed A. Ragaee
مجلة البحث
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
المشارك في البحث
الناشر
NULL
تصنيف البحث
1
عدد البحث
48
موقع البحث
www.sciencedirect.com/locate/ejrnm
سنة البحث
2017
صفحات البحث
661–669
ملخص البحث

Objective: To evaluate the additional diagnostic value of diffusion and perfusion MRI in the differentiation
of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and solitary brain metastasis.
Patients and methods: This retrospective study included 24 patients with histologically proven brain
tumors who underwent conventional MRI with analysis of diffusion (DWI) and perfusion (PWI) MRI findings
of each tumor. The Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values were calculated in the minimum
(ADC-MIN), mean (ADC-MEAN), and maximum (ADC-MAX) in all the tumors and the peritumoral regions.
The PWI data was expressed as maximum regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV) of the tumors and peritumoral
regions.
Results: After adding diffusion and perfusion to conventional MRI findings, we found that the accuracy of
differentiation between glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and solitary metastasis increased from 70% to
90%.
Results: There is a significant difference in DWI signal intensity between GBM and metastatic tumors
(P < 0.05). The ADC values of GBM were lower than that of metastatic tumors. On perfusion MRI, the maximum
rCBV of the peritumoral region (rCBVP) of GBM was higher than that of brain metastases
(P < 0.001).
Conclusion: The addition of diffusion and perfusion to the MRI protocol increases the accuracy of differentiation
between GBM and solitary brain metastasis and should be considered routinely.