Skip to main content

Laparoscopic versus Open Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison of Overall and Subgroup Outcomes.

Research Authors
Abdelhafez M1,2, Bastian A1, Rausch S1, Stenzl A1, Bedke J3, Kruck S1.
Research Department
Research Journal
Anticancer Res.
Research Publisher
NULL
Research Rank
1
Research Vol
Vol. 37 - No. 1
Research Website
NULL
Research Year
2017
Research_Pages
pp. 261-265
Research Abstract

At experienced centers, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) can achieve similar results to those of open surgery (OPN). However, the role of LPN for complex tumors and imperative indications is under debate.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
A total of 356 cases (186 LPN and 170 OPN) between 2005-2012 were reviewed. Clinical, surgical, pathological and radiological data, including PADUA classification were analyzed.
RESULTS:
In overall analysis, OPN was associated with higher tumor complexity (p≤0.03). Subgroup analysis of PADUA >8 tumors (n=85) showed no significant difference between LPN and OPN. In patients with unfavorable treatment characteristics (imperative indication/multifocal tumors, n=71) LPN was beneficial. In this subgroup, LPN led to better perioperative (p≤0.02) and postoperative (p≤0.04) outcome.
CONCLUSION:
Use of LPN is associated with favorable tumor characteristics. Although no advantage was shown for LPN for tumors with higher complexity (PADUA>8), this large series confirmed the superiority of LPN for imperative indication or multifocal tumors.